On Apr 1, 2014 4:11 PM, "Vittorio Giovara" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 1:12 PM, wm4 <[email protected]> wrote: > > --- > > doc/APIchanges | 5 ++++ > > libavcodec/avcodec.h | 67 ---------------------------------------------------- > > libavutil/frame.c | 10 ++++++++ > > libavutil/frame.h | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++ > > libavutil/pixfmt.h | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > libavutil/version.h | 2 +- > > 6 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-) > > > > So any further opinions on this patch? > I was waiting for the other patch that converts frames to pointer to > land but we could see if there are further comments on this. > Any preference for "colorspace" or "color_space"? The first is the > name in AVCodecContext the second would be a uniform name like the > newly introduced fields.
I prefer colorspace. It is already used this way so it would ease upgrading, and the multimedia industry is notorious for removing the space between two originally separate words (e.g. bitrate). Timothy _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
