On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 03:21:43 +0100, Vittorio Giovara <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: Anton Khirnov <[email protected]> > > > > This describes more accurately what this field is for. > > --- > > libavcodec/avcodec.h | 4 ++-- > > libavcodec/dxva2_h264.c | 2 +- > > libavcodec/dxva2_mpeg2.c | 2 +- > > libavcodec/dxva2_vc1.c | 4 ++-- > > libavcodec/h264_slice.c | 4 ++-- > > libavcodec/mpegvideo.c | 4 ++-- > > libavcodec/vdpau_h264.c | 2 +- > > libavcodec/vdpau_mpeg12.c | 4 ++-- > > libavcodec/vdpau_mpeg4.c | 4 ++-- > > libavcodec/vdpau_vc1.c | 4 ++-- > > 10 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > > > Probably OK but I think you should bump avcodec's minor.
Why? Either we consider this field public (can't imagine a legitimate use case for it though), then it's a major bump. Or we don't, then there's no bump. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
