On 2014-04-17 20:17:42 +0200, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 12:57:35 +0200, Janne Grunau <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On 2014-04-17 12:46:37 +0200, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > > --- > > > tests/tiny_psnr.c | 5 +++++ > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/tests/tiny_psnr.c b/tests/tiny_psnr.c > > > index 66eaf82..5f819bb 100644 > > > --- a/tests/tiny_psnr.c > > > +++ b/tests/tiny_psnr.c > > > @@ -223,6 +223,11 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) > > > a = get_f32l(buf[0] + j); > > > b = get_f32l(buf[1] + j); > > > } > > > + if (isnan(a) || isnan(b)) { > > > + fprintf(stderr, "Invalid values in the input.\n"); > > > + return 1; > > > + } > > > > (-)inf is handled as expected? just asking since you asked about isfinite > > first > > > > Actually no, seems I tested it wrong. > > When it's converted to fixed point, the inf becomes zero. > > Shall I use isfinite() or a separate isinf() call?
isfinite is nicer we could try our luck if everything supports that c99 feature. if you want to be careful use !isnan/!isinf. Testing the result fabs(b - a) is preferable in that case. Janne _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
