On 01/05/14 23:38, Martin Storsjö wrote: > This should allow Fraunhofer to contribute to these wrappers - > they weren't allowed to contribute to code under LGPL2.1 with the > "or any later" clause. > --- > I've gotten explicit approval for this from all contributors > to these files, except from Mohammad Alsaleh (author of c37c383e5) > whom I haven't been able to reach. (If he later replies, disagreeing > with the license change, we can easily drop the particular part of > libfdk-aacenc.c that he contributed.) > > The ISC license should be preferred over BSD, since we've got > more code under that license within libav and since it has got > slightly less ambiguous wording with respect to the duties of the > user of the code. I've got approval from the contributors to > relicense to that license as well, but Fraunhofer haven't yet > clarified whether they're allowed to contribute under that license, > while 2-clause BSD is ok. Once/if they figure out that the ISC > license is essentially equivalent from their point of view as > contributors, we can relicense these wrappers to that license > instead.
It should be fine. _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
