On Sun, 11 May 2014 09:29:56 +0200, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/05/14 08:23, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > This assumes every hwaccel user is frame-threaded. > > Which might be true now, but there's no reason for it to be true in general. > > When it won't be true a thin wrapper would be provided, I didn't want to > add a function w/out users. > > But it is a good point. >
It seems more likely to me that the person adding such a hwaccel won't be aware of this detail and it will be a cause of endless joy to him. Won't moving this to ff_get_buffer() work just as well? -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
