Hi,

2014-05-16 11:23 GMT+02:00 Janne Grunau <[email protected]>:
> That would probably make sense. dequantizing took around 1% on limited set
> of the samples I looked at.

On the other hand, I didn't think of the encoders, where multiple
things may justify a SIMD implementation (quantized coeff location may
not be known, rate/distortion-optimized quantization may follow, ...).

Plus it affects so many tests that the effort of changing to
on-the-fly dequantization is probably not worth the gain (code-wise,
binary-size-wise or speed-wise).

Best regards,
-- 
Christophe
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to