Anton Khirnov <[email protected]> writes: > On Sat, 24 May 2014 08:52:02 +0200, [email protected] (Niels > =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=F6ller?=) wrote:
> I find it strange that it would actually matter. > This should only be called 2 * channels times per frame, so I'd expect the > effect to be completely negligible. Me too. Michael said he measured a small overall slowdown, about 1%, on some test file. >> I think I'd prefer to write it like (untested) >> >> return ((dca_dmixtable[code] ^ sign) - sign) * (1.0 / (1U << 32)); > ^^ > not 15? Should definitely be 15. Regards, /Niels -- Niels Möller. PGP-encrypted email is preferred. Keyid C0B98E26. Internet email is subject to wholesale government surveillance. _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
