On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote: > On 04/07/14 17:21, Vittorio Giovara wrote: >> From: Gildas Cocherel <[email protected]> >> >> Sample-Id: OPFLAG_B_Qualcomm_1.bit, OPFLAG_C_Qualcomm_1.bit >> Signed-off-by: Vittorio Giovara <[email protected]> >> --- >> libavcodec/hevc.c | 2 ++ >> libavcodec/hevc_refs.c | 6 +++++- >> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/libavcodec/hevc.c b/libavcodec/hevc.c >> index 95f1c66..e06db62 100644 >> --- a/libavcodec/hevc.c >> +++ b/libavcodec/hevc.c >> @@ -545,6 +545,8 @@ static int hls_slice_header(HEVCContext *s) >> return AVERROR_INVALIDDATA; >> } >> >> + // when flag is not present, picture is inferred to be output > > Inferred (the spec states that) or assumed (we guess it is) ?
The spec explicitly says that: "pic_output_flag affects the decoded picture output and removal processes as specified in Annex C. When pic_output_flag is not present, it is inferred to be equal to 1." I'll update the title as Anton suggests too. Vittorio _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
