On 22/07/14 14:39, Martin Storsjö wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jul 2014, Luca Barbato wrote: > >> Would make much easier enlarge it when needed. >> --- >> libavformat/http.c | 2 +- >> libavformat/http.h | 2 ++ >> libavformat/mmsh.c | 2 +- >> libavformat/rtmphttp.c | 2 +- >> libavformat/rtsp.c | 2 +- >> 5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > Hmm, maybe.. But if we enlarge the general buffer in http.c, that > doesn't necessary mean that the ones in rtmphttp or rtsp need enlarging > at all. The buffers in the other protocols only need enlarging if the > code in those protocols is changed. (That could OTOH trigger a need to > enlarge the headers in http.c.) > > Then again, it doesn't really hurt much to enlarge them anyway.
Should I push it as is or just change it to use the macro in http? lu _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
