On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 06:04:47PM +0000, Anton Khirnov wrote: > --- a/doc/RELEASE_NOTES > +++ b/doc/RELEASE_NOTES > @@ -1,51 +1,47 @@ > > +strongly discouraged and will likely be deprecated in the future. The users > +should instead allocate a separate decoding or encoding context and populate > it
Users should instead allocate > +The main highlights of this release include native Opus, VP7, On2 AVC or > OpenEXR s/or/and/ > +decoder, HEVC encoding through libx265, new APIs for exporting ReplayGain and decoderS > +display transformation metadata and countless bugfixes. A large effort was > also > +expended on internal cleanups, which are not very visible to our users, but > +should make the codebase cleaner, safer and easier to maintain and extend. Maybe mention dsputil explicitly? > -Please note that our policy on bug reports has not changed. We still only > accept > -bug reports against HEAD of the Libav trunk repository. If you are > experiencing > -issues with any formally released version of Libav, please try a current > version > -of the development code to check if the issue still exists. If it does, make > -your report against the development code following the usual bug reporting > -guidelines. > +The avserver streaming tool, which has not been maintained for many years and > +was mostly broken, was removed from the tree. It was decided that it is a > +significant maintenance burden and that we do our users no service by > pretending > +to support it, while we in fact do not. Shall we remove that paragraph about bug reports? I don't particularly mind. Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
