On Sat, 23 Aug 2014 15:05:32 +0100, Kieran Kunhya <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 23 August 2014 14:13, Anton Khirnov <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Currently, the amount of padding inserted at the beginning by some audio
> > encoders, is exported through AVCodecContext.delay. However
> > - the term 'delay' is heavily overloaded and can have multiple different
> >   meanings even in the case of audio encoding.
> > - this field has entirely different meanings, depending on whether the
> >   codec context is used for encoding or decoding (and has yet another
> >   different meaning for video), preventing generic handling of the codec
> >   context.
> 
> From a user perspective am I right in saying if I send a PTS of 0,
> this will lead to my avpacket having a negative PTS?
> Whilst, yes, technically correct this might break a lot of things

Yes, it will have a negative PTS. But this is not introduced by this change,
lavc has worked this way for years now.

-- 
Anton Khirnov
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to