On 24/08/14 14:22, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > Le samedi 23 août 2014, 22:20:11 Kieran Kunhya a écrit : >>>>> + if (pd->wallclock) >>>>> + pd->pts += av_gettime(); >> >> Any reason for av_gettime instead of the monotonic clock? > > Yeah and why have an option as well? The monotonic clock is the only > reasonable option, unless you really want to inflict yourself the pains of > dealing with leap seconds and manual clock adjustment. >
av_gettime will use it globally if available. (patches appearing soon). lu _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
