Am 29.08.2014 21:57 schrieb "Ronald S. Bultje" <[email protected]>: > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Am 29.08.2014 20:03 schrieb "Ronald S. Bultje" <[email protected]>: > > > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Kieran Kunhya <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > "You're throwing a blob at me without individual author's > > > > contribution, I don't think that's > > > > appropriate." > > > > > > > > You've decided to selectively ignore the second part of the message. > > > > As I read that it says he is not happy with those changes being > > > > attributed to him. > > > > > > This is both about being able to selectively and critically (from a > > > technical PoV) analyze diffs, as well as have legally correct > > attribution. > > > I believe both are important, not just because Debian likes it, but > > because > > > it's the correct thing to do for whatever happens 10 years from now. > > > Remember JBs pains to get pieces of VideoLan relicensed under LGPL? Let's > > > prevent that, it's easy. > > > > Let me get this straight - for a decoder with two authors and no separate > > attribution you are complaining about further changes that do not carry > > separate attribution? > > https://github.com/rbultje/ffmpeg/tree/vp9 > > Yes.
A link to your github tree is supposed to tell me .. what? How is it related to this discussion of legal issues? Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
