On 10/09/14 10:54, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
Hi,
2014-09-10 10:38 GMT+02:00 Luca Barbato <[email protected]>:
On 31/08/14 21:24, Luca Barbato wrote:
Bitstream-based hw acceleration does not fit well the per-slice model.
Provide a decode() and a flush() callback to override completely the
software decoder.
---
libavcodec/avcodec.h | 12 ++++++++++++
libavcodec/utils.c | 9 +++++++--
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Are we ok with those two callbacks?
That's ok with me, as this is overall needed improvement.
Will be pushed soon as-is if nobody is against it. The fallback support
will appear later (and I should document how it should behave in the
blueprint as we discussed at VDD).
lu
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
