Here are the additional requested comparisons; mp3 fixed, mp3 float and
opus.
Tables
Decode Time (s)
codec libav libav no neon incumbent % change compared
against
aac 9.7 59.5 40.6 −76.1% faad
alac 8.1 8.1 6.5 24.6% faad
flac 10.9 11.6 11.2 −2.7% flac
ogg 9.9 47.7 35.5 −72.1% ogg123
opus 71.3 71.5 71.6 −0.4% opusdec (libopus 1.1-fixed)
mp3 (fixed) 19.2 19.2 8.5 125.9% madplay
mp3 (float) 50.7 52.7
wmav2 5.7 38.7 4.8 18.8% gst-wma-codec
(codec to codec is different content.)
On 14-10-08 06:06 PM, Janne Grunau wrote:
Which mp3 decoder did you test? Libavcodec has both fixed
and floating point.
Tables
Decode Time (s)
codec libav libav no neon incumbent % change compared against
aac 9.7 59.5 40.6 −76.1% faad
alac 8.1 8.1 6.5 24.6% faad
flac 10.9 11.6 11.2 −2.7% flac
ogg 9.9 47.7 35.5 −72.1% ogg123
mp3 19.2 19.2 8.5 125.9% madplay
wmav2 5.7 38.7 4.8 18.8% gst-wma-codec
gst-wma-codec looks fast. Do you know there it is from? Or is it fully
in gst?
missing from the comaprison is opus (which also misses arm neon
backports from arm64).
Janne
--
Jonathan Bagg
Embedded Systems Developer
NAD Electronics | Lenbrook Industries Limited
633 Granite Court, Pickering, Ontario, Canada L1W 3K1 | 905-831-0799 ext 4478 |
http://www.nadelectronics.com
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
