On 23/10/14 13:59, Martin Storsjö wrote: > After thinking more about this, I think it'd be better to keep this just > as a lavf-internal helper (either with a ff_ prefix, or as a inline > function in a header).
Sure. lu _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
