On 10/30/2014 08:20 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:05 PM, John Stebbins <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> SPS_EXT can come before the PPS and results in incomplete extradata. >> > If you want this to be really complete, may also want to add SEI (6) and > subset SPS (15), I had some sort of crazy file where this was required to > get the SPS/PPS into extradata, but I lost it. > >
Does it make sense to drop all these NAL checks and just add another flag has_pps that gets set when PPS is seen? Or is this already known to cause problems? It would be a performance hit if there is no PPS in the packet, but split isn't called often. -- John GnuPG fingerprint: D0EC B3DB C372 D1F1 0B01 83F0 49F1 D7B2 60D4 D0F7
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
