On Thu, 8 Jan 2015, Timothy Gu wrote:
Hi,
On Wed Jan 07 2015 at 2:08:19 PM Martin Storsjö <[email protected]> wrote:
---
doc/general.texi | 10 +++++++++-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Any chance of a full documentation in doc/encoders.texi?
I'll leave that to someone else - the few options it currently supports
should be quite straightforward to use (the avoptions list, plus -threads,
"-coder ac" which does the same as "-profile main" and -slices)
diff --git a/doc/general.texi b/doc/general.texi
index ae59941..31972ee 100644
--- a/doc/general.texi
+++ b/doc/general.texi
@@ -95,6 +95,14 @@ Go to @url{http://www.wavpack.com/} and follow the
instructions for
installing the library. Then pass @code{--enable-libwavpack} to configure
to
enable it.
+@section OpenH264
If this is in any other documentation file I would recommend using the real
encoder name "libopenh264", but general.texi is informational only so meh
Yeah, the headings here are using the full/"marketing" name of the
external libs.
+
+Libav can make use of the OpenH264 library for H.264 encoding.
+
+Go to @url{http://www.openh264.org/} and follow the instructions for
+installing the library. Then pass @code{--enable-libopenh264} to
configure to
+enable it.
+
It would be better if you could reference why OpenH264 is superior to x264
(i.e. why people should use it instead)
I guess I could mention that it is under the BSD license.
I'll leave more subjective descriptions like "it is comparable to x264 at
the ultrafast preset" to someone else, and such descriptions at least
belong somewhere else than here (since this file is quite matter-of-fact
style documentation - it doesn't give any opinion on which of the AAC
encoders are good/bad either).
// Martin
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
