On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:43:16PM +0100, Thomas Volkert wrote:
> --- a/libavformat/rtpdec_hevc.c
> +++ b/libavformat/rtpdec_hevc.c
> @@ -355,6 +345,78 @@ static int hevc_handle_packet(AVFormatContext *ctx, 
> PayloadContext *rtp_hevc_ctx
>          memcpy(pkt->data + sizeof(start_sequence), buf, len);
>  
>          break;
> +    /* aggregated packet (AP) - with two or more NAL units */
> +    case 48:
> +        /* pass the HEVC payload header */
> +        buf += RTP_HEVC_PAYLOAD_HEADER_SIZE;
> +        len -= RTP_HEVC_PAYLOAD_HEADER_SIZE;
> +
> +        /* pass the HEVC DONL field */
> +        if (rtp_hevc_ctx->using_donl_field) {
> +            buf += RTP_HEVC_DONL_FIELD_SIZE;
> +            len -= RTP_HEVC_DONL_FIELD_SIZE;
> +        }
> +
> +        /*
> +         * pass 0: determine overall size of the A/V packet
> +         * pass 1: create resulting A/V packet
> +         */
> +        {
> +            int pass          = 0;
> +            int pkt_size      = 0;
> +            uint8_t *pkt_data = NULL;

Is there a reason to introduce a new block here instead of moving the
variable declarations up a bit?

Diego
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to