On Fri, 20 Feb 2015, Martin Storsjö wrote:

On Fri, 20 Feb 2015, Thomas Volkert wrote:

On 19.02.2015 21:34, Martin Storsjö wrote:
From: Thomas Volkert <tho...@homer-conferencing.com>

With significant changes by Martin Storsjö, to use the shared
function instead of reimplementing it.
---
Thomas, do you have a chance retest it using this version?


No, the RTSP server with the test stream was switched off - I have no influence on this.

Ok then - then we have to settle with the fact that I think the code looks like it does the same thing. I'm sure we'll get a chance to test it later.

Alternatively, do you have any other rtp receiver that supports hevc that you can test against? I could try to add support for the aggregated mode in the packetizer (at least as an ugly hack), and if we can see that our depacketizer and a third party depacketizer both handle the output from our aggregate mode, we can be pretty sure it works as intended.

I managed to test it somewhat now at least; I made a WIP patch for aggregating multiple NAL units into one single RTP packet (for both H264 and HEVC), and both your original patch and my version of it can decode it similarly. Therefore, I'd say this works similarly, even if we can't test it with a third party stream right now.

// Martin
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
libav-devel@libav.org
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to