On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 02:18:54PM +0200, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> --- a/libavcodec/hevc.c
> +++ b/libavcodec/hevc.c
> @@ -383,24 +383,63 @@ static int decode_lt_rps(HEVCContext *s, LongTermRPS 
> *rps, GetBitContext *gb)
>      return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static void export_stream_params(AVCodecContext *avctx,
> +                                const HEVCContext *s, const HEVCSPS *sps)

indentation

> +{
> +    const HEVCVPS *vps = (const HEVCVPS*)s->vps_list[sps->vps_id]->data;

space before *

> +    avctx->pix_fmt             = sps->pix_fmt;
> +    avctx->coded_width         = sps->width;
> +    avctx->coded_height        = sps->height;
> +    avctx->width               = sps->output_width;
> +    avctx->height              = sps->output_height;
> +    avctx->has_b_frames        = sps->temporal_layer[sps->max_sub_layers - 
> 1].num_reorder_pics;
> +
> -    s->avctx->coded_width         = sps->width;
> -    s->avctx->coded_height        = sps->height;
> -    s->avctx->width               = sps->output_width;
> -    s->avctx->height              = sps->output_height;
> -    s->avctx->has_b_frames        = sps->temporal_layer[sps->max_sub_layers 
> - 1].num_reorder_pics;

Is there a reason to suddenly set pix_fmt as well?  It sure looks odd in
a refactoring-only patch.

The amount of space before = is slightly odd, not that I care.

Diego
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to