On 28/04/15 15:21, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > I think it's better to change the function not to need 64 blocks, > as in the second patch I sent.
Your patch assumes that the required block number information is fine and returning that partial decode is better than returning no data, I'm not sure about it and we already reject impossible block values. I do not know the format, so my assumption that the nblocks < 64 is impossible is as good as yours. lu _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
