On 5/2/2015 9:34 PM, Martin Storsjö wrote: > It's not irrelevant at all. Previously, the first member of x265_picture > used to be a struct (which would be why the extra braces were added), now > it isn't a struct any longer, causing warnings due to the extra braces. Or > at least this is a potential explanation - does this match the actual > evolution of the x265_picture struct?
Interesting... I admit I thought it was a rehash of the original warning due to compiler versions. This is pretty lulz though... - Derek _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
