On 30/06/15 21:18, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 9:11 PM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 30/06/15 20:42, Anton Khirnov wrote:
>>> Quoting Luca Barbato (2015-06-30 20:35:50)
>>>> On 30/06/15 20:29, Anton Khirnov wrote:
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  libavformat/hevc.c | 2 +-
>>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/libavformat/hevc.c b/libavformat/hevc.c
>>>>> index 4d43b6a..26db3b1 100644
>>>>> --- a/libavformat/hevc.c
>>>>> +++ b/libavformat/hevc.c
>>>>> @@ -636,7 +636,7 @@ static uint8_t *nal_unit_extract_rbsp(const uint8_t 
>>>>> *src, uint32_t src_len,
>>>>>      uint8_t *dst;
>>>>>      uint32_t i, len;
>>>>>
>>>>> -    dst = av_malloc(src_len);
>>>>> +    dst = av_malloc(src_len + FF_INPUT_BUFFER_PADDING_SIZE);
>>>>>      if (!dst)
>>>>>          return NULL;
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please do not use "/" in tags.
>>>
>>> why not?
>>>
>>
>> Because plaid.host/tags/lavf/hevc is annoying to support (I'll add a
>> deploy of the software soon).
>>
> 
> So what is it supposed to say?

"lavf: hevc:"

> Just "hevc" will make everyone think its avcodec, just "lavf" isn't
> any better. I find this tag quite suitable, personally. Fix your
> software. It should serve us, not we it.
> 

 and obviously patches welcome :)

lu



_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to