On 01/07/15 14:35, wm4 wrote: > So the question is: would it be ok to finally drop XP support for the > sake of cleaner and simpler code?
I'm all for having simpler code. > (Besides, even if we're forced to implement extra hacks for XP > compatibility, who is going to test it?) I hope that if somebody has that specific needs he could come up with a compat patch that reimplements InitOnceExecuteOnce and such. The alternative is just to keep the lock-manager around only for those that need it. (or change the API to avoid the problem completely). lu _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
