On 03/07/15 01:20, Luca Barbato wrote: > On 03/07/15 00:07, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: >> Otherwise a frame with non-zero nb_samples but without any data can be >> returned. >> >> Signed-off-by: Andreas Cadhalpun <[email protected]> >> --- >> libavcodec/wmalosslessdec.c | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/libavcodec/wmalosslessdec.c b/libavcodec/wmalosslessdec.c >> index 8094db3..0c85c83 100644 >> --- a/libavcodec/wmalosslessdec.c >> +++ b/libavcodec/wmalosslessdec.c >> @@ -1005,6 +1005,7 @@ static int decode_frame(WmallDecodeCtx *s) >> if ((ret = ff_get_buffer(s->avctx, s->frame, 0)) < 0) { >> /* return an error if no frame could be decoded at all */ >> s->packet_loss = 1; >> + s->frame->nb_samples = 0; >> return ret; >> } >> for (i = 0; i < s->num_channels; i++) { >> >
Actually it sounds more fishy. How packet_loss is reset w/out filling the frame? lu _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
