On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On 08.08.2015 14:33, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> +const uint8_t *ff_reverse = av_reverse;
>>
>> Importing data tables from another library is something we try to
>> avoid. Keeping a duplicate of 256 bytes is favorable.
>
> Why?
>
>> Maybe the deprecation should just make it private instead of dropping
>> it. Public data tables are evil. :(
>
> In what why are they evil?
>

You can find the long reasonings and discussion on the ML if you want to.
The short answer is that your patch will break a couple
configurations, and would need some extra magic to make these exports
work everywhere - but that ends up ugly, so we try to avoid them
entirely.
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to