Quoting Andreas Cadhalpun (2015-08-24 23:43:30) > On 24.08.2015 13:44, Vittorio Giovara wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 28/07/15 15:41, Vittorio Giovara wrote: > >>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> On 28/07/15 15:30, Vittorio Giovara wrote: > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Vittorio Giovara <[email protected]> > >>>>> --- > >>>>> doc/APIchanges | 14 +++++++------- > >>>>> libavcodec/version.h | 6 +++--- > >>>>> libavdevice/version.h | 4 ++-- > >>>>> libavfilter/version.h | 4 ++-- > >>>>> libavformat/version.h | 4 ++-- > >>>>> libavresample/version.h | 4 ++-- > >>>>> libavutil/version.h | 4 ++-- > >>>>> libswscale/version.h | 2 +- > >>>>> 8 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > > > I believe to see general consensus towards applying the set as is. > > There is no consensus for that. > > > I've added a skeleton to the wiki > > (https://wiki.libav.org/Migration/12) so that we can properly document > > the necessary changes before we release. Any help with that is of > > course welcome. > > I have a work-in-progress API-porting-guide. > > > If no objections I'll push this set in the following days. > > Can you explain why you believe it makes any kind of sense to remove > widely used APIs like FF_API_PIX_FMT/FF_API_AVCODEC_FRAME, while > keeping completely useless ones like FF_API_MISSING_SAMPLE? >
Sigh, I thought you had accepted mine and other people's arguments for why keeping those APIs is bad. As for missing_sample, sure we can drop it as well. It was never really intended to be public anyway. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
