Quoting Martin Storsjö (2015-09-07 09:29:52) > On Mon, 7 Sep 2015, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > > Quoting Martin Storsjö (2015-09-05 19:33:39) > >> The previous restriction was partially designed to fix certain > >> (broken) samples from bug 215. There should be no restriction on the > >> number of keyframes per fragment or trun. > >> > > > > So what happens now to those broken samples? > > When the bug was filed, seeking failed completely, since there was no > keyframes at all. > > Now seeking succeeds (probably seeking to any frame), and the output still > is ok (since it probably doesn't output anything until it gets a proper > decodable frame anyway) - I just retested it. > > So the issue in bug 215 isn't broken again, but only behaves slightly > differently (possibly seeking to a different frame than before; possibly > even closer than before, if the file actually had more than one keyframe > per fragment). >
Ok, sounds good to me then. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
