On 11/09/15 01:34, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 12:44 AM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 10/09/15 17:05, Vittorio Giovara wrote: >>> From: Luca Barbato <[email protected]> >>> >>> --- >>> libavfilter/graphparser.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- >>> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >>> >> >> If it works for you, works for me =) > > I'm slightly confuzzled. So some time ago you remove the "old" syntax > from the generic code, and then you re-add it in filter-specific > hacks?
Did I? > If this syntax is desired, wouldn't it be nice to have the generic > code take care of it again? Being able to mix and match positional and non-positional arguments might be sort of nice, it wasn't globally implemented that I know. lu _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
