On 08/10/15 17:01, wm4 wrote: > On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 13:14:49 +0200 > Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 08/10/15 12:56, wm4 wrote: >>> On Thu, 08 Oct 2015 11:22:36 +0300 >>> Rémi Denis-Courmont <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> (And pthread-stubs is a much better solution to this "problem", as it >>>> can (de)select multithreading at run time rather than build time.) >>> >>> +100000 >> >> Possibly we can add a dependency for it if enough people want it, but it >> is sort of unrelated... > > It's extremely related. We could use pthread function names directly, > instead of going through our stupid ff_ aliases.
Where is the patch to support it then? =) Right now there is already some code to support disabled threads by no-opping the mutex, I added a little bit to support pthread_once and updated the patch from Derek. Adding support for pthread-stubs is surely nice, but it is not something I'd investigate now. lu _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
