On 08/10/15 15:27, Derek Buitenhuis wrote: > On 10/8/2015 9:08 AM, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: >> I would assert and abort here. The most likely problems here are >> deadlocks (i.e. recursive initialization) and memory corruption (once >> ff_h264_vlc_init is garbage)... > > I initially had this since Hendrik's patch could fail, but that is no > longer the case. > > I have no strong opinion on what to do in the error case - you're screwed > regardless. >
Since, as you said, you cannot improve I'm keeping that part as-is and I'd push the set if nobody has strong opinions (the no-thread wrapper got the pointer dereferences fixed locally). _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
