On 13/10/15 21:30, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> Le 2015-10-13 20:47, Luca Barbato a écrit :
>> On 13/10/15 18:21, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
>>> Le 2015-10-13 12:44, Martin Storsjö a écrit :
>>>> From: Carl Eugen Hoyos <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>> Some overly strict implementations require this, even though it
>>>> technically is incorrect according to the spec.
>>>
>>> That's not overly strict, that's just plain broken. Overly (or not so
>>> overly) strict implementations require that there be no quotes here.
>>>
>>> It might be a good idea to accept invalid extraneous quotes for IOP.
>>> Sending invalid messages ones on purpose is insane. The problem is known
>>> and the conclusion from RFC7616 was to verry explicitly FORBID quotes.
>>>
>>
>> You suggest to drop the patch or to update the commit message (I already
>> amended it with s/overly strict/faulty/ locally.)
> 
> I suggest dropping the patch.
> 
> Postel's principle is to be strict in what you send, relaxed in what you
> accept. Though there has been recent push for being strict both ways due
> to, notably, security concerns.
> 
> There never was a reasonable proposal to be relaxed in what you send,
> for a good reason.
> 

Patch dropped then =)
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to