Quoting wm4 (2015-10-16 19:10:43)
> On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 02:26:45 +0200
> Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > ---
> >  libavformat/mux.c | 7 ++-----
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/libavformat/mux.c b/libavformat/mux.c
> > index e86d202..bdcc38c 100644
> > --- a/libavformat/mux.c
> > +++ b/libavformat/mux.c
> > @@ -416,12 +416,9 @@ int ff_interleave_add_packet(AVFormatContext *s, 
> > AVPacket *pkt,
> >      this_pktl      = av_mallocz(sizeof(AVPacketList));
> >      if (!this_pktl)
> >          return AVERROR(ENOMEM);
> > -    this_pktl->pkt = *pkt;
> > -    pkt->buf       = NULL;
> > -    pkt->side_data = NULL;
> > -    pkt->side_data_elems = 0;
> > +
> >      // Duplicate the packet if it uses non-allocated memory
> > -    if ((ret = av_dup_packet(&this_pktl->pkt)) < 0) {
> > +    if ((ret = av_packet_ref(&this_pktl->pkt, pkt)) < 0) {
> >          av_free(this_pktl);
> >          return ret;
> >      }
> 
> I don't really know what's going on. Is it a problem that pkt->buf etc.
> are not reset after this? It looks like the intention was actually to
> transfer ownership?

I agree, this smells like 9001 memleaks.

-- 
Anton Khirnov
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to