On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 11:25:43 +0100 Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 28/10/15 02:45, Vittorio Giovara wrote: > > imho go for "rawframes", no space like other codes, different from > > Changed this way, will hit the tree this night. Wrong color. IMHO it's misleading, because it sounds very similar to rawvideo, without making clear that it's a very special encoder to wrap AVFrames. This is not just another codec, but a mechanism to pass through AVFrames, with a very unusual packet format. (It's the only format that requires you to read pointers to normal memory from packet data.) While I agree that "wrapped_avframe" is not ideal, "rawframes" doesn't sound very telling. I suggest "rawvideo_avframe". (Sorry for bikeshedding.) _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
