"Alexandra Hájková" <[email protected]> writes:
> The tables will be used to support bitexact QMF and LFE reconstruction.
> ---
> libavcodec/dcadata.c | 588
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> libavcodec/dcadata.h | 5 +
> 2 files changed, 593 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/libavcodec/dcadata.c b/libavcodec/dcadata.c
> index 6c41aef..efb08a2 100644
> --- a/libavcodec/dcadata.c
> +++ b/libavcodec/dcadata.c
> @@ -7280,6 +7280,527 @@ DECLARE_ALIGNED(16, const float,
> ff_dca_fir_32bands_nonperfect)[512] = {
> +1.390191784E-007
> };
>
> +DECLARE_ALIGNED(32, const int32_t, ff_dca_fir_32bands_perfect_fixed)[512] = {
> + 0, 0, -3, -10,
> + -35, -105, -218, -141,
...
> + -141, -218, -105, -35,
> + -10, -3, 0, 0
> +};
If this table (and the others) are symmetric,
table[k] == table[511 - k]
then the second half of the table could be eliminated, which might be a
good idea.
For optimization, it's mainly a tradeoff between more complex access to
the table (I haven't looked at the code, maybe it's easy to do?), and
increased cache pressure from a larger table.
Best regards,
/Niels
--
Niels Möller. PGP-encrypted email is preferred. Keyid C0B98E26.
Internet email is subject to wholesale government surveillance.
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
