On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 04:09:09PM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > On 05.01.2016 14:32, Luca Barbato wrote: > > On 05/01/16 13:25, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > >> Otherwise invalid values are used unchecked in the next run. > >> This can cause NULL pointer dereferencing. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Andreas Cadhalpun <[email protected]> > >> --- > >> libavformat/asfdec_o.c | 18 ++++++++++-------- > >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > Could you please resend against our tree? > > You can just run sed 's/asfdec_o/asfdec/' on the patches. > Such annoyances could have been avoided if this demuxer had worked > better, when it got committed.
The demuxer worked perfectly with all available samples at the time, better in fact with some samples. It has received some improvements since. Remind me why there is still a reason to have two demuxers. (Leaving aside the question why there was ever a reason for two demuxers.) Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
