On 15/01/16 19:15, James Almer wrote: > On 1/15/2016 2:35 PM, Luca Barbato wrote: >> On 15/01/16 18:24, Derek Buitenhuis wrote: >>> On 1/15/2016 5:10 PM, Luca Barbato wrote: >>>> --- >>>> >>>> Possibly we could drop the 3 lines above. >>>> >>>> configure | 2 +- >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> Normally I'm all for pkg-config. However for OpenSSL, it >>> is a system library on some platforms and does not have >>> a .pc file, AFAIK. >>> >> >> I added the check instead of replacing it, so it would just work for >> those systems if it was working before. > > If there's a .pc file then IMO it's preferable over the generic check. > I'd say move the pkgconfig check to the top, replacing require_pkg_config > with use_pkg_config so it doesn't call die() upon failure. > _______________________________________________ > libav-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel >
Sure, good idea. _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
