On 19/01/16 23:11, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: > This should probably error then on account of an explicit request that > cannot be fulfilled.
It is in my plans, but I wanted to reduce it to the smallest changeset first and then build from it. To make it fail I need to change so instead of having 3 states (yes, no, other) switch to (yes, no, other, yes-fail), the early patches were experiments with "_". Then the setting would use a set_all yes-fail and then disable should error when it transitions from yes-fail to no. lu _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
