On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Anton Khirnov <[email protected]> wrote: > Quoting Vittorio Giovara (2016-01-20 18:41:57) >> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Anton Khirnov <[email protected]> wrote: >> > It is of very limited usefulness and is a source of important security >> > problems. >> > >> > Bug-Id: CVE-2016-1897 >> > Bug-Id: CVE-2016-1898 >> > --- >> >> I'm ok with removing this, however shouldn't this be followed by a >> version bump of some sort? >> I'm not sure whether this is 'only' an API break or if it's inherently >> an API+ABI break. > > It's neither, adding or removing and muxers, demuxers, protocols, > codecs, filters, whatever has, in itself, no effect on API or ABI.
well not a break per se, but if a user tries to use one of the removed features it will just fail to do so, breaking their code. Anyway this particular case is fringe enough that it probably does not matter. -- Vittorio _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
