On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 3:44 AM, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 02:27:13PM -0500, Vittorio Giovara wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Leave these out or create proper fine-grained dependencies. Bloating >> > the build for the other codecs is not acceptable. I have a very similar >> > patch in a branch I need to revisit some day, waiting for me to address >> > the same issues. >> >> ok what would be the best way to so though? a CELP target like the >> current one and several other ones with less files compiled in? > > A solution so that no target gets bloated, i.e. all codecs have just > the bare necessities compiled-in. Otherwise it's a size regression > for certain builds.
This is not a very helpful message: I proposed an alternative solution, and one that does not take years to appears on the ML. I guess I'll go for the tacit assent. At any rate the "size regression" you mention only happens if the dead code elimination for that build is completely broken. -- Vittorio _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
