On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:38:20AM -0500, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 3:17 AM, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:48:12AM -0500, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 5:10 AM, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 07:45:25PM -0500, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
> >> >> --- a/libavcodec/eatqi.c
> >> >> +++ b/libavcodec/eatqi.c
> >> >> @@ -35,69 +35,177 @@
> >> >>
> >> >> +/* Based off mpeg1_decode_block_intra from mpeg12dec.c */
> >> >
> >> > s/Based off/Duplicated from/
> >>
> >> it's not strictly duplicated as it has some simplifications, but ok
> >
> > Well, one "simplification" I noticed was mixing declarations and statements,
> > so ...
> >
> >> > I don't see this as an improvement.
> >>
> >> why?
> >
> > Because it's code duplication, pure and simple.
> 
> you can't be seriously comparing the mpegvideo detangling and a
> complete decoder deduplication (mpeg1) to the addition of a single
> relatively small function

Yes, I can.  You are turning an increase in size on the library level
for one obscure config (eatqi w/o mpeg1) to actual code duplication.

Diego
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to