On 27/01/16 12:10, Peter B. wrote: > > On 01/27/2016 09:05 AM, Anton Khirnov wrote: >> I don't really understand your position -- on one hand you don't want to >> remove "useful" functionality, even though the concat protocol is IMO >> borderline-useless. OTOH you are quite fine with breaking applications >> by adding restrictive defaults. > > I'm a user of "concat" for creating lossy access-copies of segmented > lossless archival files. > This is done in one step, integrated in an automated mass-digitization > workflow.
You can use hls as an editlist. It is much flexible incidentally. lu _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
