On 10/02/16 16:35, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 06:54:40PM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote:
>> --- a/configure
>> +++ b/configure
>> @@ -4512,6 +4515,7 @@ done
>> enabled avisynth && { check_lib2 "avisynth/avisynth_c.h windows.h"
>> LoadLibrary ||
>> check_lib2 "avxsynth/avxsynth_c.h dlfcn.h"
>> dlopen -ldl ||
>> die "ERROR: LoadLibrary/dlopen not found, or
>> avisynth header not found"; }
>> +enabled cuda && check_lib cuda.h cuInit -lcuda
>> enabled frei0r && { check_header frei0r.h || die "ERROR:
>> frei0r.h header not found"; }
>> enabled gnutls && require_pkg_config gnutls gnutls/gnutls.h
>> gnutls_global_init
>> enabled libbs2b && require_pkg_config libbs2b bs2b.h bs2b_open
>> @@ -4606,7 +4610,7 @@ if enabled libdc1394; then
>> fi
>>
>> if enabled nvenc; then
>> - check_header cuda.h || die "ERROR: cuda.h not found.";
>> + enabled cuda || check_header cuda.h || die "ERROR: cuda.h not found.";
>> check_header nvEncodeAPI.h || die "ERROR: nvEncodeAPI.h not found.";
>> check_cpp_condition nvEncodeAPI.h "NVENCAPI_MAJOR_VERSION >= 5" ||
>> die "ERROR: NVENC API version 4 or older is not supported";
>
> Checking for cuda.h again seems unnecessary.
one is to have cuda dlopenable, the other to link directly.
> Shouldn't nvenc depend on cuda somehow?
No.
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
