Quoting Mark Thompson (2016-02-17 23:49:13) > > How opposed are you to a bit of VAAPI-specific API here? Having got a > bit further, the one specific which would be useful to avoid annoying > duplication is the enumeration of formats available in a given > configuration (which can then be passed as sw_format when making a > hw_frames_ctx). It's currently done in the device setup to get > transfer formats, then identically in the vaapi_scale filter, then > again in encoder setup. >
I general, I'm not completely opposed to vendor-specific API if it's useful and necessary (the hwctx itself already counts as such). But enumerating valid values for sw_format does not strike me as especially VAAPI-specific. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
