Quoting Diego Biurrun (2016-03-21 16:31:23) > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 03:00:17PM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > --- a/libavcodec/hevc_parse.c > > +++ b/libavcodec/h2645_parse.c > > @@ -155,14 +155,14 @@ static int hls_nal_unit(HEVCNAL *nal, AVCodecContext > > *avctx) > > > > -int ff_hevc_split_packet(HEVCPacket *pkt, const uint8_t *buf, int length, > > - AVCodecContext *avctx, int is_nalff, int > > nal_length_size) > > +int ff_h2645_packet_split(H2645Packet *pkt, const uint8_t *buf, int length, > > + AVCodecContext *avctx, int is_nalff, int > > nal_length_size) > > Is there a reason to switch the word order? "split_packet" does sound > more natural to me...
Because later I'm adding an uninit function. The switched order makes it more obvious that they belong together. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
