On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Martin Storsjö <[email protected]> wrote:
> ---
>  libavformat/rtpdec_h264.c | 2 +-
>  libavformat/rtpdec_vp9.c  | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libavformat/rtpdec_h264.c b/libavformat/rtpdec_h264.c
> index d7b39ac..d7c5e15 100644
> --- a/libavformat/rtpdec_h264.c
> +++ b/libavformat/rtpdec_h264.c
> @@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ static int h264_handle_packet(AVFormatContext *ctx, 
> PayloadContext *data,
>          av_log(ctx, AV_LOG_ERROR,
>                 "Unhandled type (%d) (See RFC for implementation details)\n",
>                 type);
> -        result = AVERROR(ENOSYS);
> +        result = AVERROR_PATCHWELCOME;
>          break;
>
>      case 28:                   // FU-A (fragmented nal)
> diff --git a/libavformat/rtpdec_vp9.c b/libavformat/rtpdec_vp9.c
> index 5049469..9a92b93 100644
> --- a/libavformat/rtpdec_vp9.c
> +++ b/libavformat/rtpdec_vp9.c
> @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ static int vp9_handle_packet(AVFormatContext *ctx, 
> PayloadContext *rtp_vp9_ctx,
>       */
>      if (has_ss_data) {
>          avpriv_report_missing_feature(ctx, "VP9 scalability structure data");
> -        return AVERROR(ENOSYS);
> +        return AVERROR_PATCHWELCOME;
>      }
>
>      /*
> --

ok
-- 
Vittorio
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to