Hi, 2016-05-03 18:19 GMT+02:00 Vittorio Giovara <[email protected]>: > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 7:11 AM, Christophe Gisquet > <[email protected]> wrote: >> For the 2nd aspect, you've already told you're not interested in that code, >> but when replacing bitstream_read_32(s, 1) by bitstream_read_bit(s) at this >> location: > > You know, the best way to make a dev care about some code is making > sure that that code is present in that dev's project.
Really, I don't care about either code - and I'm certainly not willing to spend time doing what you imply. Please remark that it is mostly about the effect of the patchset. And that would be that dev's project's loss if I was not reviewing and not reporting potential issues and so on, right ? But ok, I don't mind stopping mentioning any issue related to said code from now on. -- Christophe _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
