On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 01:49:54PM +0200, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> Quoting Diego Biurrun (2016-05-04 09:51:53)
> > On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 08:44:49AM +0200, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> > > Quoting Martin Storsjö (2016-05-03 08:38:19)
> > > > On Tue, 3 May 2016, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> > > > > --- a/configure
> > > > > +++ b/configure
> > > > > @@ -185,53 +185,62 @@ Individual component options:
> > > > > +  --enable-libopencv         computer vision
> > > > > +  --enable-libopenh264       H.264 video encoding/decoding
> > > > 
> > > > We only have the encoder half of OpenH264 hooked up
> > > 
> > > My intention was to describe what the library does, instead of what
> > > parts of it we support (since that can and does change and then usually
> > > nobody bothers to update the text).
> > 
> > That's a poor excuse for bad documentation.  Let's instead try to not
> > neglect the documentation instead.
> 
> It's not an excuse and I don't think the new documentation is "bad".

That's not what I meant, your new approach is certainly an improvement.
I just don't think we should settle for less than precise descriptions
just because people were too lazy to maintain them properly in the past.
Let's instead try to do a better job in the future.

Diego
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to