On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 08:27:53PM +0200, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: > On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 8:23 PM, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote: > > This exposes some required functionality like _aligned_malloc() in the > > MinGW system headers, thus obviating the need for the memalign hack. > > Except this isn't actually required functionality today and apparently > builds fine right now.
Because we have this silly workaround called memalign_hack. > Maybe you should at least more clearly document that it would then > require always building against a newer target OS then before. Document where? In the log message? Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
